Year 16 Number 95 2008



May 15th, 2008


"Unshakable faith is only that which can face reason face to face in every Humankind epoch." 
Allan Kardec






     "THE only idea man can affix to the name o God, is that of a first cause, the cause of all things. And, incomprehensibly difficult as it is for a man to conceive what a first cause is, he arrives at the belief of it, from the tenfold greater difficulty of disbelieving it. It is difficult beyond description to conceive that space can have no end; but it is more difficult to conceive an end. It is difficult beyond the power of man to conceive an eternal duration of what we call time; but it is more impossible to conceive a time when there shall be no time.

    In like manner of reasoning, everything we behold carries in itself the internal evidence that it did not make itself. Every man is an evidence to himself, that he did not make himself; neither could his father make himself, nor his grandfather, nor any of his race; neither could any tree, plant, or animal make itself; and it is the conviction arising from this evidence, that carries us on, as it were, by necessity, to the belief of a first cause eternally existing, of a nature totally different to any material existence we know of, and by the power of which all things exist; and this first cause, man calls God.

    It is only by the exercise of reason, that man can discover God. Take away that reason, and he would be incapable of understanding anything;"


Thomas Paine
The Age o
f Reason - Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology
  [Chapter X - CONCERNING GOD, AND THE LIGHTS CAST ON HIS EXISTENCE AND ATTRIBUTES BY THE BIBLE, p. 47 - Edited by Moncure Daniel Conway
Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York - 2004]

 

 °EDITORIAL


A LOVED ONE IS GOING HOME! Written by Yvonne Limoges


 ° THE CODIFICATION


GENESIS: The Miracles and the Predictions According to Spiritism


 ° ELECTRONIC BOOKS


CHRISTIANITY AND SPIRITUALISM by Leon Denis

 ° SPIRIT MESSAGES


HEAVEN AND HELL - PART SECOND - EXAMPLES


CHAPTER III - SPIRITS IN A MIDDLING CONDITION


 ° ARTICLES


THE RATIONAL QUEST FOR OUR SPIRITUALITY by Ricardo C. Mastroleo, Ph.D



 ° NEWS, EVENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS


LEARNING ABOUT LIFE WITH CHILDREN: Cases on Near Deach Experiences in Children
20th PAN AMERICAN SPIRITIST CONGRESS
JOINT CONFERENCES IN THE UK
THE SPIRITIST MAGAZINE: An Official Publication of International Spiritist Council - ISC



 
 ° EDITORIAL

A LOVED ONE IS GOING HOME

Written by Yvonne Limoges

         Birth and death are such a natural and necessary cycle of our lives. People rejoice at births when a spirit is only just starting a material life…yet better than not, it will be mostly full of trials and tribulations (in other words, suffering). Then, people are generally upset when a person is going to die or dies, although that is when the spirit has just finished their trials and sufferings and are set free once again. The spirit finally is unfettered by the gross material envelope of its physical body and (depending on its moral and intellectual level) is able to travel in an instant to wherever, regain the knowledge it had acquired throughout eons of time, and remember a myriad of past lives; how wonderful!

My father is bedridden at home, where my mother most conscientiously cares for him. The wonderful people who work for the Hospice organization come in to help out, as do our family. As I sit and watch my father, as he holds my arm, I think, how wonderful that his soul will soon be set free within the spirit world. Dad, you will then be free! He speaks little, and since he sleeps most of the day and night, his spirit is (I’m sure) in preparation. At the appointed time, he can get rid of that fragile body that has him prisoner, the one through which he cannot fully express himself like he used to (with that personality that I truly miss already).

Yet, we must be content to wait until he has paid down to “the last iota” of whatever suffering he must go through before his final hour. In addition, it is also a trial for my mother in caring for him, and for all of our family and friends to see him so disabled as tests of our faith.

I constantly pray his transition to the spirit world will be a smooth one and that he goes without unduly worrying about us, and I pray for his spiritual protection and well being. I send him all my loving blessings and well wishes, and that he be received with open arms by all those who love him, those family and friends who are already there waiting for him. I have no doubt that there will be a wonderful rejoicing in the spirit world for him!

God -Willing, he will be there waiting for me, when it is my own homecoming…!


Note from the Editor:

This is indeed an inspiring message that shows how beneficial is the knowledge that Spiritism brings to all of us. As the great poet and playwright George Bernard Shaw once stated, Death is the ultimate statistic – one out of one of us dies”. Hence, the best way to face this natural and unavoidable phenomena is by having a rational faith, one that instead of annihilating oneself, gives us the certainty that we are immortal spirits and encourages us to face the continuation of life in the hereafter.

GEAE's Editorial Council


Back to Content

 ° THE CODIFICATION

GENESIS: The Miracles and the Predictions According to Spiritism

BY Allan Kardec
Author of "The Spirits' Book," "The Mediums' Book," and "Heaven and Hell."

Translated By The Spirit-Guides of  W. J. Colville
[Colby & Rich, Publishers - 1883 - Boston - USA]

The spiritual doctrine is the result of the collective and concordant teachings of spirits.
Science is called in to make the statements in Genesis agree with the laws of nature.
God proves his greatness and power by the immutability of his laws, and not by their suspension.
For God the past and the future are the present.


CHAPTER XVIII

  SIGNS OF THE TIME


The First Part of this Article was published on the SM # 94

     13. Spiritual life is the normal and eternal life of the spirit; and incarnation is only a temporary form of its existence. Save the exterior vestment, then, there is, then, identity between the embodied and disembodied. These are the same individualities under two different aspects, belonging sometimes to the visible and sometimes to the invisible world, finding themselves again either in one or in the other, concurring in both to the same end by means appropriate to their situation. From this law flows that of perpetuity of connection between created beings. Death does not separate them, and does not put an end to their sympathetic relations or reciprocal duties, from whence springs solidarity of all beings for each other, and each one for all; from which also comes fraternity. Men will not live happily upon the earth until these two sentiments shall have entered into their hearts and in their manners; for then they will conform to their laws and their institutions.
    It is through these that the principal results
of the transformation will be accomplished. But how to conciliate the duties of solidarity and fraternity with the belief that death renders forever men strangers to one another? By the law of the perpetuity of connections which bind together all beings, Spiritism founds this double principle upon the laws themselves o nature; it makes not only a duty of it, but a necessity. By that of the plurality o existences, man attaches himself to that which has been done, and that which will be done, to men o the past and those of the future. He can no more say that he has nothing in common with the dead, since both ind each other again and again continually in this world and the other, in order to climb the ladder o progress together, and to lend mutual support to one another. Fraternity is no more circumscribed to a few individuals which chance assembles together during the ephemeral duration of life. It is perpetual as the life of the spirit, universal as humanity, which constitutes a great family, of which all the members are joined to one another at whatever epoch they may have lived.

    14. Such are the ideas which springs
from Spiritism, and which will be created in all men when it shall be universally dispersed, comprehended, taught, and practiced. With Spiritism, fraternity is synonymous with the charity preached by Christ. It is no more a vain word; it has its purpose in lie. From the sentiment of fraternity is born that of the reciprocation of the social duties from man to man, from people to people, from race to race. From these two sentiments, well comprehended, will spring necessarily the most profitable institutions for the welfare of man.


    15.
Fraternity must be the corner-stone of the new social order. But there is no real, solid, and effective fraternity if it has not been supported upon an unchangeable base. This base is faith, - not the faith in such and such particular dogmas, which change with time and people, and at which the stone is cast, and in anathematizing it they sustain the antagonism to it, but the faith in fundamental principles which all the world can accept, - God, the soul, the future, individual progress as well as indefinite, the perpetuity of connection between individuals. When all men shall be convinced that God is the same to all, that this God, sovereignly just and good, can will no injustice; that evil comes from men, and not from him, - they will regard themselves as children of the same Father, and will extend to him the hand.
     It is this faith which is given to Spiritism, and which will henceforth be the pivot upon which human beings will move, whatever be their mode of adoration and their particular beliefs, which Spiritism respects, but with which it desires not to occupy itself. From this faith alone can spring veritable moral progress, because that it alone gives a logical sanction to legitimate rights and duties. Without it the right is that which strength gives, - duty a human code, imposed by constraint. Without it, what is man? A little matter, which is dissolved; an ephemeral being, which is made only to pass away. Genius, even, is but a spark which shines an instant, only to be extinguished
forever. There is no certainty of any thing which is revealed to his eyes. In connection with such thoughts, where, really, are the rights and duties?
    What is the object o
f progress? This faith alone makes man eel his dignity by the perpetuity and progression of his being, - not in a paltry future, circumscribed to personality, but one grand and splendid. This thought elevates it above the earth. It feels itself expand by thinking that it has its role in the universe; that this universe is its domain, which it will be able to pass over some day; and that death will not annihilate it, or make o it a useless being to itself and others.


    16. The vast proportion o intellectual progress which has been accomplished is a great step, and marks the
first phase o humanity; but alone it is impotent to regenerate it. So long as man will be governed by pride and egotism he will use his intelligence and his knowledge for the profit of his passions and personal interests. For this reason he applies them to the perfection o means for injuring others, and of destroying each the other. Moral progress alone can assure the happiness of men upon the earth by patting a rein upon their bad passions. It alone can make harmony, peace, and fraternity reign between them.
    It is this which will break down the barriers between them, which will destroy the prejudices o
f caste, silence the antagonisms of sects, by teaching men to regard themselves as brothers called to aid one another, and not to live at the expenses of one another. It is moral progress, seconded by the progress of intelligence, which will lead men to one belief established upon the eternal truths, not subject to discussion; and for this accepted by all. The unity of belief will be the most powerful bond of union, the most solid foundation for universal fraternity, which has alway been broken by religious antagonisms, which divides people and families, which makes one see in a neighbor a person to fly from - one to combat, exterminate, - instead of a brother whom we should love.

    17. Such a state o things supposes a radical change in the sentiment o the masses, a general progress which could be accomplished only by departing
from the circle of narrow ideas, and quitting the ground which fosters pride. At different epochs superior men have sought to lead men into this way; but humanity, yet too young, has remained deaf, and their teachings have been like good seed fallen among stones. Now humanity is capable of looking higher then it has done, in order to assimilate larger ideas, and comprehend that which it had never before comprehended. This generation which will disappear will carry with it its prejudices and errors; the generation which is being educated has drunk at a purer spring, is imbued with healthier ideas, will impress on the world the ascensional movement by way of moral progress, which must mark the new phase of humanity.

    18. This phase is already revealed by unmistakable signs, by attempts at use
ful reforms, by grand and generous ideas which are brought to light, and which commence to find echoes. Multitudes of protective, civilizing, and emancipating institutions are founded under the management and by the introductory movement of men evidently predestined to the work of regeneration; while each day the penal laws seem to be impregnated with a more humane sentiment. The prejudices of race are weakened. Nations commence to regard themselves as members of one great family. By the uniformity and facility of the means of transaction, they abolish the barriers which divide them. In all parts of the the world they unite in universal assemblages for electing officers and passing laws, and for pacific interchange of sentiments. But to these reforms a base is wanting to complete, develop, and consolidate them, - a more general moral predisposition in order to bear fruit, and to be accepted by the masses. It is no less a characteristic sign of the time, the prelude of that which will be accomplished upon a larger ladder by measure, as the ground will become more propitious.

     19. A sign no less characteristic o
f the period upon which we enter is the evident reaction in spiritualistic ideas. An instructive repulsion is manifested against materialistic ideas. The spirit of unbelief, which was carrying away the masses, ignorant or enlightened, and had made them reject with the form even the true basis of all faith, seems to have been asleep, on the awakening from which one experiences a need of breathing a more life-giving air. Involuntarily, where the void has been made, one seeks something, a support, a hope.

    20. In this great regenerative movement, Spiritism has a considerable role, not the ridiculous Spiritism invented by a jesting critic, but the philosophical Spiritism, such as whoever comprehends it must seek the almond under its shell. By the proo
fs it brings of fundamental truths, it fills the void which infidelity make in ideas and belies; by the certitude which it gives of a future conformed to the justice of God, and which the most severe reason can admit, it tempers the bitterness of life, and hinders the fatal effects of despair; by making known new laws of nature, it gives the key of hitherto unknown phenomena and of insoluble problems, and kills a the same time infidelity and superstition. To it nothing is supernatural or miraculous; all is accomplished in the world by virtue of immutable laws. Far from substituting one exclusivism for another, it stands as an absolute champion of the liberty of conscience; it combats bigotry under all forms, and cuts it to the root by proclaiming salvation for all good men, and the possibility for the most imperfect of, by their efforts, expiation and reparation, to that perfection which alone conducts to supreme felicity.
    Instead o
f discouraging the weak, it encourages them by showing them the haven to which they can attain. It does not say, "Outside Spiritism is no salvation," but with Christ, Outside of charity is no salvation, no principal of union, no tolerance, which will rally men round a common sentiment of fraternity, instead of dividing them into sects in enmity to each other. By this other principle there is no unchangeable faith than that which can look reason face to face in all ages of humanity; it destroys the empire of blind faith, which annihilates reason by passive obedience which brutalizes; it emancipates the intelligence of man, and elevates his moral being. Consequently, it does not impose itself upon any one; it tells that which it is, what it wishes, and what it is, and waits for them to come freely, voluntarily; it wishes to be accepted by the reason, and not by force; it respects all sincere beliefs, and combats only infidelity, selfishness, pride and hypocrisy, which are the plagues of society, and the most serious obstacles to moral progress; but it gives the anathema to no one, not even to its enemies, because that it is convinced that the good road is open to the most imperfect.

     21. I
f one suppose the majority o men imbued with these sentiments, one can easily figure the changes it would bring in social relations, - charity, fraternity, kindness towards all, tolerance for all beliefs; such will be their motto. It is the end towards which humanity is evidently tending without being very sure of the means of realizing them. It tries, it counts the pulse, but is arrested by active resistance, or the force of the inertia of the prejudices of stationary beliefs which are opposed to progress. These are resisting forces, which it must vanquish; and it will be the work of the new generations. If one follows the present course of things, one will recognize that all seems predestined to prepare the way for it. There will be the double power of number and of ideas, and, moreover, the experience of the past.

    22. The new generation will march them to the realization o
f all compatible humanitarian ideas with the degree of advancement to which it will have reached. Spiritism marching towards the same end, and realizing its views, they will meet each other on the same ground. Men of progress will  find in the ideas o the Spiritists a powerful lever, and Spiritism will find in men new minds entirely disposed to welcome it. With this state of things, what will those do who would desire to place an obstacle in its way?

    23. It is not Spiritism which creates social renovation. it is the maturity o
f humanity which makes this renovation a necessity. By its moralizing power, by its progressive tendencies, by the liberty o its views, by the generality o the questions which it embraces, Spiritism is, more than any other doctrine, qualified to second the regenerative movement; or that reason it is contemporary with it. It has come at the moment when it could be useful; for it also is the time arrived. Sooner, at an earlier date, it would have encountered insurmountable obstacles. It would have inevitably succumbed, because men, satisfied with that which they had, had not experienced a need for that which it brings. Now, born with the movement of fermenting ideas, it finds the earth prepared to receive it. Spirits, tired of doubt and of incertitude, frightened by the gulf that opens before them, welcome it as an anchor of salvation and a supreme consolation.

     24. By saying that all humanity is ripe
for salvation, we do not wish to convey the idea that all individuals are so in the same degree; but many have intuition he germ o new ideas, which circumstances will bring to light; then they will show themselves more advanced than they were supposed to be, and they will eagerly follow the impulsion of the majority. There are those, however, obstinately opposed, even among the most intelligent, and who assuredly will never embrace it, at least in this existence, - some o these in good faith by conviction, others by interest.
    Those whose material interests are joined to the present state o things, and who are not advanced enough to sacri
fice them, to whom the general good is of less account then their own, cannot see without apprehension the least reformatory movement. Truth is for them a secondary question, or, rather, truth for certain people is in that which causes them no trouble. All progressive ideas are to their eyes subversive ones; for this reason they vow implacable hate to them, and make towards them inveterate war. Too intelligent not to see in Spiritism an auxiliary o these ideas, and the elements of the transformation which they dread, because they are not far advanced enough to receive it, they force themselves to combat it. If they judged it to be without value or importance, they would not bother themselves with it. Besides, as we have already said, "The greater an idea is, the more adversaries it encounters, and the importance of it can be measured by the violence of the attacks of which it is the object."

    25. The number o
f those who have not joined our ranks is still great without doubt; but what can they do against the rising wave, except to throw a few stones at it? This wave is the generation which is being educated by it, whilst those who do not believe will disappear with the generation which is rapidly passing away. Until that they will defend every step of the ground. There is an inevitable contest, but an unequal one; for it is that of a decrepit past, which falls into fragments against the juvenile future; of stagnation against progress; of the creature against the will of God, - for the times appointed by him are come.

Note from the Editor: The closing part of this Chapter XVIII of the book Genesis [The New Generation] was published on the SM # 90
                                                                                                      
Back to Content

 ° ELECTRONIC BOOKS

CHRISTIANITY AND SPIRITUALISM

The History of the Gospels
The Secret Doctrine of Christianity
Intercourse with the Spirits of the Dead
The New Revelation

Vitam Impendere Vero

By

LÉON DENIS

Author of
"Après La Mort, "Dans L'Invisible," ETC.


Translated from the French by
HELEN DRAPER SPEAKMAN

LONDON
PHILIP WELLBY
6 Henrietta Street Covent Garden
1904

This book is out of print indefinitely 

1st Electronic Edition by 

the Advanced Study Group of Spiritism (GEAE)
 
2006

COMPLEMENTARY NOTES

Note # 6

ON THE INTERCOURSE OF THE EARLY CHRISTIANS WITH THE SPIRITS

    In the philosophical Greek language, the word demons (daimon) is synonymous with genius or spirit. Such was the demon of Socrates. There was a distinction made between the good and bad demons; Plato even calls God  the "all-powerful demon." Christianity has adopted the same terms, but has changed their meaning. The good demons are now called angels, and the bad have become demons, without the adjective. The word spirit (pneuma), has remained the expression used for designating an intelligence deprived of its earthly body.

    St Jerome translates the word "pneuma" by "Spirits," admitting with the evangelists that there are good and bad spirits. The idea of deifying the spirit only appeared in the third century. It was only after the adoption of the Vulgate that the word "Sanctus" was constantly coupled with the word "spiritus," and this combination in most cases only succeeded in rendering the sense more obscure and sometimes quite unintelligible.

    The translators of the canonical books have contributed to pervert their original meaning. Here is one example among many. In Luke XI. 10, Greek text, we find: "For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth, and to him that knocketh it shall be opened." V. 13, "If ye then being evil know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give a good spirit to them that ask Him?"

    The translators give it "the Holy Spirit," which is against sense. In the Vulgate, translated from Greek into Latin, there is "Spiritum bonum," literally "good spirit." The Vulgate does not mention the Holy Spirit. The primitive Greek text is even more explicit, and indeed, it could not have been otherwise, since the Holy  Spirit, as a third person of the Trinity, was only thought of at the end of the second century.

    On the subject of the relations of the early Christians with the spirits, the following passages of Scripture may arrest our attention. In Acts XXI. the prophet Agabus tells Paul that a spirit warns him not to go up to Jerusalem. The English and French translations have it the "Holy Spirit." 1 Cor. XIV. 30, 31, gives the order to be observed in the meetings of the faithful: "If anything be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace. For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all may be comforted."

    It appears from this instruction that to prophesy is but to transmit a teaching, it is the role of the speaking or incorporated medium.

    In Acts XXIII. 6, Paul, addressing an assembly, says: "Of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question." And there arose a great discussion and some of the Pharisees strove, saying: "We find no evil in this man; but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God." Acts XVI. 16, 17 - Paul had been warned in a dream to pass into Macedonia with Timothy: "As we went to prayer, a certain damsel possessed with a spirit of divination met us, which brought her masters much gain by soothsaying. The same followed Paul and us and cried, saying: "These men are the servants of the most high God, which show us the way of salvation."

    The expression "spirit of Python" signified, in the language of the times, a bad spirit. It was used by the orthodox Jews, who admitted only the official prophesying, recognized and guaranteed by priestly authority when its teachings coincided with their own; on the other hand, they condemned popular prophesying, which was practiced especially by women who drew a profit from it, as in our day by certain paid mediums. But this qualification of "spirit of Python" was often arbitrary.  We find the proof of it in the fact that the seeress or pythoness of Endor, who served as a medium for Saul to communicate with the spirit of Samuel, possessed, according to the Biblical expression, a "spirit of Python." But it is not possible to confound the spirit of Samuel with spirits of an inferior order. The scene as described in the Bible is imposing and grand and presents all the characteristics of a high manifestation. 1 

    In the case of the young servant girl, quoted above by St Paul, if we admit that bad spirits can follow the Apostles, and preach the Gospel, it becomes difficulto to distinguish the source of inspiration.

    This was the principal endeavour in all the assemblies of the faithful. We find the confirmation of this in a celebrated document, of which we here give an analysis: "La Didachè," a little treatise discovered in 1873 in the library of the Patriarch of Jerusalem, at Constantinople, and probably composed in Egypt between the years 120 and 160, sheds a new light on the organisation of the Christian Church at the beginning of the second century, on its worship and its faith. It consists of several parts, the first, essentially moral, embraces six chapters intended for the instruction of the catechumenus. What strikes one especially in this catechism is the complete absence of all dogmatic element. The second part treats of the rites of worship, that is to say, of baptism, prayer, and the communion; the third part contains a liturgy and a discipline. It recommends the observation of the day of rest; it furnishes the rules for distinguishing the true prophets, (read mediums) from the false, it indicates the conditions required for a bishop or deacon, and concludes with a chapter of the final things, and the "Parousia" or return of Christ.
   
    This work presents a very different picture of the primitive Church from that which we generally imagine to ourselves. It has been translated into French, and published by Paul Sabatier, Doctor of Theology at Strasbourg, published by Fischbacker, Paris, 1885.

    In the same way that the pharisees accused certain prophets of being animated by the "spirit of Python," so, among the Catholic priests of our day, there are some who attribute the spiritualistic manifestations to demons or infernal spirits.

    "They are demons," says the Archbishop of Toulouse, in his Lenten mandte, 1875, "since it is forbidden to consult  the dead. God refuses them the faculty of satisfying our vain curiosity."

    But He did not refuse to allow Samuel, in the case mentioned above, to satisfy the curiosity of Saul at Endor.

    All the Catholic priests do not, however, share this opinion. Among the clergy there are keen minds which have understood the importance of the spiritualistic manifestations and their true character.

    Père Lacordaire wrote on June 20th, 1853 to Madame Svetchine, in reference to table-turning: "Perhaps, by this manifestation God wishes to proportion the development of the spiritual forces to the material, so that man should not forget, in the presence of the marvels of mechanics, that there are two worlds included one in the other, the world of bodies and the world of spirits." Père P. Le Brun, of the Oratoire, in his work entitled "Histoire des pratiques superstitieuses," vol. VI. 358, expresses himself thus: "The souls who enjoy eternal beatitude, absorbed in the contemplation of the glory of God, yet interest themselves in what concerns the men whose miseries they themselves have felt; and, as they have attained to the happiness of the angels, all sacred writers attribute to them the privilege of being able, under an aerial body, to render themselves visible to their brethren on earth, to comfort them and teach them the divine will."

    The Abbé Marouseau writes to Allan Kardec: "Show man that he is immortal. Nothing can better help you in this noble work than the manifestations of the spirits from beyond the tomb. Only in this way can you come to the aid of religion and fight side by side with her the fight of God."

    The Abbé Lecana, in his history of Satan, speaks thus of the moral role of spiritualism: "By following the maxims of the 'Book of the Spirits,' of Allan Kardec, we should become saints upon earth."

    Thus, on one side in the Catholic Church, spiritualism is condemned as contrary to the laws of God and the Church, and on the other side it is considered an auxiliary ofreligion and is spoken of as "fighting the fight of God." In the presence of such contradictions, great must be the perplexities of believers.

    It is the same in the Protestant Churches. Many clergymen, and not the least eminent, accept spiritualism without hesitation. We may read in this connection the opinion of Pasteur  Bénézech, of Montauban, expressed in his "Causeries" in 1892.

    In London, the Rev. H. R. Haweis, preaching on the "doctrine of the dead," at Marylebone Church, invited his hearers to come into the vestry after his sermons to examine photographs of spirits.

    More recently in St James' Church, the same orator preached on the "tendency of modern spiritualism," and concluded by saying that the "facts of spiritualism are in perfect accord with the general mechanism and the theories of Christian religion." (See the review "Light" of London, 7th August 1897. See also "Christianity and Spiritualism," a pamphlet containing a lecture delivered by Mr Haweis before the London Spiritualistic Society, published by "Light.") 2
    
    A number of American clergymen entertain the same ideas.

    The "Neue Spiritualistische Blatter" of March 16th, 1893, publishes a translation of an article by Mr Savage, pastor of the Unitarian Church of Boston, in which that thinker and talented writer, well known in the United States, relates his researches into psychic matters, and tells of the way in which he was brought to believe in spiritualistic facts in the following article:-
    "In regard to these questions, I thought, as did once the honest folk of Jerusalem, of Corinth, and of Rome about Christianity; it seemed to me to be a pestilential superstition. Once, fortified by my invincible ignorance, I preached a sermon under four heads against these ideas, after which it surprised me to find among my friends enlightened people who still persisted in believing therein.
    Seventy years ago, a member of my church lost his father. Shortly afterwards, he came to tell me that he had gone with a friend to see a medium who had told him some most convincing things, and he begged for my advice on the subject. I perceived at last that it was not proper for me to give an opinion on a subject of which I was totally ignorant, my whole knowledge thereof consisting in a stock of prejudices. The rapid spread of spiritualism among the educated classes of Boston showed me that it was needful that I should seriously examine the phenomena in question, since it was possible, nay, probable, that other members of my congregation would come to me about them. I therefore said to myself: be they true or false, in either case I must study these things throughly to be able to advise intelligently. I perceived that it was a shame to me that I had no opinion about the statemens in the Old and New Testaments relating to apparitinons and demoniacal influences. Why should I be proud of my ignorance of things important to the members of my church? I saw that it was my duty to study these phenomena conscientiously, until I had arrived at an intelligent opinion of their value. These were the principal motives which led me to these long and minute researches.
    In these researches, I followed the scientific method, which seems to me the only one leading to sure knowledge. I always sought to convince myself by minute observation, whether or no I was dealing with a real fact, and I paid no attention to the manifestations which too, place in the dark, or when I could not fully assure myself of their reality.
    Without for a moment implying that manifestations obtained under such circumstances are necessarily due to fraud, I nevertheless put them aside. Moreover, I throughly learned the tricks of conjurers, by which means I soon saw that imitations of the phenomena produced under other circumstances had no relation to the facts. The greater number of the manifestations which I was obliged to recognise as real and which effectually convinced me, took place in the presence of a few reliable friends, and without a professional medium.
    Once sure of a fact, I always called in the aid of every possible theory to explain it without having recourse to the theory of the spirits. I say, the theory of the spirits, and not a supernatural explanation, for I believe that there is nothing supernatural. If there are spirits, our inability to see them does not render them any more supernatural than the atom is supernatural to science, although equally invisible.
    Well, I discovered facts which prove that the 'I,' the ego, does not die, and that after what we call death it is able, under certain conditions, to enter into communication with us."

    The Rev. J. Page Hopps, in a meeting of clergymen at Manchester, affirmed his belief in the reality of the "communion of the spirits in the visible and invisible," and proposed the founding of a Church which should communicate "the messages from on high." ("Aurore," July 1893.)

    In an article in the Pontefract Express, of January 1898, the Rev. C. Ware, a minister of the Methodist Church, speaks at length of the "Acts of Apostles." He advises Christians to make a careful study of this book, on account of the innumerable and marvellous facts related therein, which are none other than spiritualistic phenomena. He observes that at the outset of the stablishment of Christianity, two classes of workers were constantly in contact, the incarnate and the disembodied spirits. Mr Ware mentions the two men dressed in white who, when Jesus had disappeared from the sight of His disciples, came and conversed with them and instructed them; the gathering in the upper chamber, with the phenomena of lights and noises, the influences controlling those present and causing them to discourse int strange tongues, etc.; the marvellous cures performed by the early Christians, the deliverance from prison of Peter and John, the shaking of the house in which a prayer-meeting was being held, the sending of Philip to the eunuch and his disappearance by ocult means; the warning of Cornelius by a spirit, and the vision of Petter on that subject; the marvellous manifestations which turned Paul from an assassin and persecutor into a most zealous apostle; the ecstasies and remarkable gifs which proved he was the instrument of invisible powers; in short, all the extraordinary phenomena which accompanied the preaching of the disciples, after the tongues of fire had descended on their heads, and the ardent fervour aroused in the early Christians by these phenomena, which are all reproduced today in spiritualistic séances.


¹ See 1 Samuel XXVIII. 6.

²
"Light," 110 St Martin's Lane, London.

Next: Complementary Notes # 7 and the Following
Back to Content

 ° SPIRIT MESSAGES

HEAVEN AND HELL
Or
The Divine Justice Vindicated in the Plurality of Existence

Concerning

The passage from the earthly life to spirit-life,
future rewards and punishments,
angels and devils, etc.

Followed by numerous examples of the state of the soul,
during and after death.

BEING THE PRACTICAL CONFIRMATION OF "THE SPIRITS' BOOK"

BY Allan Kardec

Translated from the Sixtieth Thousand - By Anna Blackwell
[London: Trubner & Co., Ludgate Hill - 1878]

Part Second - Examples

CHAPTER I

  THE PASSAGE
Second Part
[The First Part was published on the SM # 94]

    6. In examining the passage from the earthly life to the spirit-life, another point, and one of the greatest importance, has to be noted, viz., the mental confusion which usually accompanies the separation of the soul from the body. At the moment when this separation is taking place, the soul is seized with a sort of torpor which paralyzes its faculties, and, at least, to a certain extent, neutralizes its sensations; it is in a state resembling  catalepsy, so that it is rarely conscious of the termination of the process of dying. We say very rarely, because there is a case in which the soul may preserve its self-consciousness to the very last, as we shall presently see. The state of confusion may therefore be considered as the normal condition of the sou at the moment of death; its duration differs in different cases and may vary from a few hours to many years. When this confusion passes off, the soul finds itself in the position of one who is awaking out of a deep sleep; its ideas are muddled, vague, and clouded; it sees, so to say, through a fog; but, little by little, its sight becomes clearer, its memory comes back, and it regains the consciousness of itself. But this awaking is very different, according to the character of the individual; with some, it is calm and accompanied with delightful sensations; with others, it is full of terror and anxiety, and is like a hideous nightmare.

    7. The moment when the body heaves the last sigh is, consequently, not the most painful, because, in general, the soul is then in a state of unconsciousness; the suffering attendant on dying is undergone either before, or after, the moment of dissolution. The suffering which precedes death is due to the convulsions that accompany the disaggregation of the physical body; that which follows death results from the distress occasioned by the confusion of which the soul becomes conscious as it gradually regains possession of its faculties. Let us hasten to say, however, that this suffering is not usual. As we have already remarked, the intensity and duration of the suffering that may accompany death is in exact proportion to the affinity which exists between the body and the perispirit; the closer is this affinity, the longer and the more painful will be the spirit's efforts to free himself from the links by which he is held to the body; but there are persons in whose case the cohesion is so slight that the disengagement of the perispirit is effected spontaneously and naturally, and without any conscious effort on the part of the spirit. In such cases, the fleshly body drops away from the spirit as gently and easily as the ripe fruit drops from the three; and this peaceful death is followed by a waking equally peaceful.

    8. The moral state of the soul is the condition which determines the ease, or the difficulty, with which the spirit disengages himself from his terrestrial envelope. The strength of the affinity between the body and the perispirit is in the exact ratio of the spirit's attachment to materiality; it is, consequently, at the maximum in the case of those whose thoughts and interest are concentrated on the earthly life and the enjoyment of material pleasures; it is almost null in the case of those whose soul has identified itself, beforehand, with the spirit-life. The slowness and difficulty of the separation depending entirely on the degree of the soul's purification and dematerialization, it is in the power of each of us to render our passage, from the life of the earth to that of the spirit-world, more or less easy or difficult, pleasant or painful.
    This point being laid down, both as a theoretic principle and as a result of observation, we have now to examine the influence exercised, by the various kinds of death, on the sensations of the soul at the moment of dissolution.

    9. In all cases of natural death, that is to say, of death resulting from the extinction of the vital forces by age or disease, the separation is effected gradually; in the case of those whose soul is dematerialized and whose thoughts are detached from earthly things, the disengagement of the spirit is almost complete before death takes place; the body is still vitalized by the organic life, when the soul has already entered upon the life of the spirit-world, and is only held to the body by a link so slight that it breaks, of itself and without effort, with the last beat of the heart. A spirit, in this situation, may have already recovered his mental lucidity, and may therefore be the conscious witness of the extinction of the life of the body from which he rejoices to be freed; for such a one, confusion scarcely exists; death is, for him, only a moment of peaceful sleep, from which he issues with an indescribable impression of happiness and hope.
     In the case of the worldly-minded and the sensual, of those who have lived with the life of the body rather than with that of the intelligence, for whom the things of the spirit-life are non-entities - not even being thought of by them as realities - everything in their earthly life has helped to tighten the links which bind them to matter; nothing, through all their earthly career, has tended to relax, before hand, the links which have to be severed abruptly when the hour of their departure has come. As death approaches, the soul, in these cases also, effects its disengagement by degrees, but through a series of continuous and painful efforts. The convulsions of the process of dying, under the conditions we are now considering, are the index of the conflict undergone by the spirit, who, at one moment, tries to break the bonds which resist his efforts to get himself free, and, at another moment, clutches at the body of which he would fain regain possession, but from which he is violently torn away, bit by bit, by an irresistible force.

    10. A spirit attaches himself all the more strongly to the life of the body, in proportion to his inability to see anything beyond it; he feels that the organic life is escaping him, and he does his utmost, but in vain, to retain it within his grasp; Instead of yielding himself up to the movement which is drawing him away, he resists it with all his might; and, in some instances, the struggle is thus prolonged for days, for weeks, of for months. Undoubtedly, in such cases, the spirit is no longer in possession of his usual lucidity; the confusion attendant on dissolution has begun, for him, long before death actually occurs; but his suffering is none the less severe, and the state of vagueness and doubt in which he finds himself, his certainty as to what will become of him, add poignancy to his trouble. Death at length takes place, but his misery is not ended. His mental confusion still continues; he feels that he is alive, but he knows not whether he is living with the fleshly life or with spirit-life; and his struggles are prolonged until the last links between his perispirit and his body are completely broken. In such a case, death has put a term to the disease which has killed the body, but it has not arrested the repercussion of the physical effects of corporeal dissolution in the consciousness of the spirit; so long as any points of contact exist between the body and the perispirit, the spirit feels, and suffers from, the processes of decay that are going on in the former.


Note from the Editor: The theoretical part of the above Chapter I will be concluded on our next issue. In the following topics of this and the next issues of the Spiritist Messenger, the reader will see a variety of communications from spirits in different conditions [Happy Spirits; Spirits in a Middling Condition and Suffering Spirits], which will enable them to have a better understanding about the theoretical arguments on the aforementioned chapter.


Back to Content

CHAPTER III - SPIRITS IN A MIDDLING CONDITION

Joseph Bré
[Died in 1840; evoked at Bordeaux, in 1862, by his granddaughter]

Uprightness in the sight of God, and uprightness according to the judgment of men.

    Q. Dear Grandfather, will you tell me how you are situated in the spirit-world, and give me such details concerning your present life as may be useful for our advancement?
    A. Most willingly, my dear child. I am expiating my want of faith; but the mercy of God is great, and makes allowance for circumstances. I suffer; not as you understand suffering, but from regret that I did not make a better use of my time upon the earth.
    Q. How can you say that you did not make a good use of it? You always lived the life of an upright man.
    A. Yes, as men judge of uprightness; but there is an abyss between what passes for uprightness among men, and the uprightness that is approved as such by God. I will try, for your instruction, to make you understand the difference between them.
    Among you, a man is looked upon as upright if he respects the laws of his country (although this respect is, with many, extremely elastic), and if he abstains from robbing his neighbor of his property, although he may rob him of his honor, of his happiness, provided the vile hypocrite does so in ways that escape the action of the law and of public opinion. What a mistake! To be upright in the sight of Heaven, it is not enough to have abstained from transgressing the laws of men, it is necessary, above all, not to have transgressed the laws of God!
    The upright man in the sight of God is he who, filled with devotion and charity, spends his life in doing good, in helping forward the progress of his fellow-creatures; he who, being animated with a zeal that is kindled by the foresight of the end to be obtained, is perpetually active in all the business of life; active in fulfilling the duties imposed upon him by his worldly position, for he should inculcate the love of labor among his brethren; active in every good work, for he must not forget that he is a servant of whom the Master will by-and-by demand an account of the way in which he has spent his time; active in pursuing the great end of life, inculcating by his example the love of God and of the neighbor. He who would be upright in the sight of God must carefully avoid the cutting remarks, the insidious suggestions, that destroy reputations and ruin positions, by dishonoring their victims or by making them objects of ridicule. The heart of the man who would be judged upright by God must be free from the least taint of pride, envy, and ambition. He must be patient and gentle with those who attack him; he must forgive, from the bottom of his heart, without effort and without ostentation, all those who have wronged him; he must love the Creator in all His creatures; he must, in short, put in practice the summary of human duties - so concise and yet so complete! - "Thou shalt love God above all things and thy neighbor as thyself."
    Such, my dear Granddaughter, is an imperfect outline of what constitutes uprightness in the sight of God. I as you, candidly, did I fulfill all these conditions? No; I was very far from doing so; I confess the fact without hesitation. I was not active in all good works, as I ought to have been; my forgetfulness of God led me into other sorts of forgetfulness which, though not punishable by human laws, are none the less offences against the law of God. I suffered much when I came to perceive this fact; and therefore I am able now to hope, with the consoling hope that is born of faith in the mercy of God, who sees my repentance. Tell this to others, my dear child; repeat it to all those whose conscience is burdened. Let them atone for past remissness by doing good to the very utmost of their power; and the Divine pity will accept their expiations and wipe out the memory of their faults.

Mrs. Helen Michel
    [Died suddenly, in her home, at the age of twenty-five, without pain, from some cause not ascertainable by science. She was rich, rather frivolous, and, owing to the frivolity of her disposition, more intent on the trifles of life than on more serious matters; yet, notwithstanding this defect, she was good-hearted, gentle, benevolent, and charitable.
    Evoked, three days after her death, by persons who had known her, she expressed herself as follows:-

    "I don't know where I am! .... What a state of confusion I am in! .... You have called me, and I come .... but I cannot understand why I am not in my home. They are weeping for my absence, and yet I am among them, but I cannot make any of them see me! My body no longer belongs to me, and yet I feel it cold and icy. I try to get away from it, and I am riveted to it, I keep coming back to it. I am two persons. .... Oh, when shall I be able to understand what has happened to me? I must go there! My other ME, what would become of it, if I stayed away? .... Adieu!"

   
"The feeling of duality, which has not yet been destroyed by a complete separation, is very evident here. Her naturally frivolous disposition had been rendered still more frivolous by her wealth, which had enabled her to gratify all her caprices. It is therefore not strange that the separation, in her case, should have been slow, and that, three days after her death, she should still feel herself linked to her physical body. But, as she had no vice and was a good woman in the main, her situation was not a very painful one and did not last long. Evoked again, a few days later, her ideas were found to have changed very considerably. Here is what she said: -

    "Thank you for praying for me. I recognize the goodness of God in sparing me all suffering and apprehension at the moment of the separation of my body and soul. My poor mother will find it very difficult to be resigned to my loss; but she will be sustained, and what, to her eyes, appears as a terrible misfortune, was indispensable to her good, in order that the things of the other life might be seen by her in their true light, as the only things of real worth. I shall be near her until the end of her earthly trial, and I shall help her to bear it. I am not happy; bu I have still much to do in order to raise myself towards the sojourn of the Blessed. I shall pray to be permitted to return upon this earth, for I shall have to make up for the time I wasted in my last existence. Let your faith sustain you, my Friends; have confidence in the efficacy of prayer, when it comes really from the heart; God is kind."

    Q. Were you long in recovering your Consciousness?
    A. I understood that I was dead, the day you prayed for me.
    Q. Was your state of confusion a painful one?
    A. No; I did not suffer, I thought I was dreaming, and I expected to awaken. My life was not exempt from pain; All who are incarnated in the earth must needs suffer; I was resigned to the will of God, and He has counted it in my favor. I am grateful to you for the prayers which helped me to regain consciousness. Thanks; I shall always come to you with pleasure. Adieu. HELEN

The Marquis of Saint-Paul
[Died in 1860; evoked, at the request of his sister, a member of the Paris Society, the 16th May, 1861]

    (Evocation) - A. Here I am.
    Q. Your sister has asked us to evoke you; although a medium, she is not sufficiently developed to have confidence in herself.
    A. I will do my best to reply to you.
    Q. She wishes, in the first place, to know whether you are happy.
    A. I am in erraticity; and that state is neither very happy, nor very unhappy.
    Q. Were you long in recovering consciousness?
    A. I remained for a considerable time in the state of confusion; and I only emerged from it to bless the charity of those who had not forgotten me, and who had prayed for me.
    Q. Can you say how long the confusion lasted in your case?
    A. No.
    Q. Who were the spirits first recognized by you?
    A. My father and mother, both of whom received me on my waking and initiated me into the new life.
    Q. How was it that, at the end of your illness, you seemed to be conversing with those whom you had most loved during your life?
    A. The world I was about to enter was revealed to me before my death. I became clairvoyant before I died; but my spirit-sight was clouded at the moment of my definitive separation from the body, because the links between my body and soul were still very vigorous.
    Q. Why were your remembrances principally those of your childhood?
    A. Because the beginning of a life is nearer to its end than is the middle of it.
    Q. What do you mean by that statement?
    A. I mean that the dying recall, and see, in a sort of consoling mirage, the innocent years of their childhood.

   
It is probably through a Providential ordaining of a similar nature that the old, as they near the end of their life, regain so clear a remembrance of the smallest details of their early days.

    Q. Why, in speaking of your body, did you always allude to it in the third person?
    A. Because, being clairvoyant, as I told you just now, I had a clear perception of the duality of my physical and moral being; the difference between these, though lost sight of by us while they are united by the vital fluid, is distinctly visible for those who, in dying, become clairvoyant.

   
The perception of duality, here alluded to, was very marked in the case of this gentleman. In his last moments, he invariably said: - "He is thirsty; give him something to drink." "He is cold, warm him." "He is suffering in such and such part;" and so on. And when those about him remarked, "But it is you who are thirsty," or "It is you who want something warm," etc., he always replied, "No, it is he." In this case, the two existences were clearly defined. The thinking me is in the spirit and not in the body; the spirit, already partly disengaged from the body, saw the latter as another individual, as something that was not really himself; and consequently it was not to him, the spirit, but to his body, that drink was to be given. This same perception of the duality of the soul and body is frequently manifested by somnambulists.

    Q. What you have said of being in erraticity, and of the prolongation of your state of confusion, would seem to imply that you are not very happy; yet your many excellent qualities would have led us to infer the contrary. It is true that, among errant spirits, some are happy, while others are unhappy?
    A. I am in a state of transition; what are considered as virtues among men, are appraised, in this world, at their true value. My present state is a thousandfold preferable to that of terrestrial incarnation; but I have always aspired after the highest truth and the highest beauty, and my soul will not be satisfied until it has reached the glories which it has to win by further effort.

Back to Content

 ° ARTICLES

THE RATIONAL QUEST FOR OUR SPIRITUALITY *

by Ricardo C. Mastroleo, Ph.D

1 – Introduction

Human beings have always tried to understand the world surrounding them. The driving force for this quest can be related to two main factors: an inherent curiosity to understand the great variety of natural phenomena and how humankind fits in the grand scheme of things, and more pragmatically, a constant need to learn how to utilize the available natural resources for survival as well as to attain a better quality of life. From the earliest times, it has always been important to know the best time to plant crops, how to fabricate better tools and weapons, how to process and preserve food, how to build a safer shelter or how to treat various illnesses.

For a long time humans relied almost exclusively on their senses to extract or infer information about nature, which is why at one point in time general wisdom held that the earth was flat, or that the stars were mere fixtures in the sky. At the same time, there have always been many facets of nature that could not be explained according to conventional knowledge. In these cases it was not uncommon to attribute a natural phenomena to a supernatural or divine source. Having no knowledge about meteorology and electricity, peoples of many early cultures believed in the Thunder God. Unaware of the mechanics that govern the solar system, ancient Egyptians believed in the Sun God, who every night bravely fought the evil forces of darkness to emerge victorious the next morning. Thousands of years later and after extraordinary improvement in the knowledge of natural laws, what used to be viewed as religious concepts of lightning and day and night completely migrated from the realm of religion to become part of a scientific knowledge accepted by everyone. What used to be discussed only among priests, today is taught in science classes of elementary schools.

In this endless process of knowledge acquisition, two questions have always engaged philosophers, religious leaders and scientists of all times in a quest for answers. They are: How is the world made?” and “Is there life after death?”. Sections 2 and 3 discuss how western thinkers have addressed these questions since the ancient Greeks, emphasizing the significantly different approaches that have been employed to deal with each one of them. On the one hand, an astonishing progress has been achieved in the understanding of our observable universe by searching the answers to the question “How is the world made?” through rational inquiry followed by scientific observations and data analysis. On the other hand, the answers to the question “Is there life after death?” have been mostly restrained to different religious beliefs where, in most cases, dogmas prevail over reason and spirituality remains largely disallowed to scientific examination. Section 4 describes some successful scientific endeavors to understand the spiritual nature of human beings,
and Section 5 contains the concluding remarks.

2 – From the Ancient Greeks to Middle Ages

The ancient Greeks set a different tone in the western civilization’s quest for knowledge, by using reason far more than religion to understand the intricacies of the natural world. The Greek thinkers started to search for a more rational and logical order in the universe. For the first time the question “How is the world made?” had a natural, non-religious answer when Thales of Miletus (624-548 B.C.) conjectured that everything in the universe was made of water. It doesn’t matter that the answer was wrong but it is quite remarkable that an attempt to explain the world was made without invoking any divine cause or revealed truth.

From Thales of Miletus to Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), almost two centuries of a philosophical thought based on rational inquiry laid the foundation for the Greek view of the world where the correct way to understand nature must occur primarily through reason. (The importance of methodical observation in conjunction with mathematical data analysis as a method to acquire scientific knowledge was established over a thousand of years later by Galileo.)

Greeks still answered the question “Is there life after death?” based on their religious beliefs. Ancient Greek religion was polytheistic, i.e., consisting of the worship of many gods. They believed that their souls survived the death of their bodies and were carried on to another dimension to an afterlife whose fate was determined by their conduct and behavior in the present life.

The Aristotelian view of the universe dominated the western world’s scientific thought for many centuries. It consisted of a very clear distinction between the objects on earth and in heaven, with respect to their behavior and composition. Objects on Earth were formed by the combination of only four components: fire, earth, water and air. The motion of any earthly object was governed by its inherent tendency to find its natural place, the center of the Universe, which happened to be located at the center of the Earth. On the other hand, the heavenly objects were formed by a fifth element, called quintessence, considered to be immutable and incorruptible. The natural motion of any heavenly object was circular, which was the basis of the geocentric system, where all celestial bodies were thought to move in a circular orbit around the Earth, which stood static at the center of the Universe. Although wrong, the Aristotelian view was rational, absent of any attribution to a divine cause and consistent with the observations and astronomical information he had available at that time.

As for the immortality of the soul, contrary to his master and mentor Plato as well as the Greek religious traditions, Aristotle considered the soul as part of the body, from which it could never be separated, thus precluding any possibility of an afterlife. With the advent of Christianity a few centuries later, his view of the soul was to be seriously challenged.

The Aristotelian view of the world, including geocentrism, which was in agreement with the scriptures, continued through the Middle Ages and remained untouched for many centuries. However, Aristotle’s view about the fate of the human soul was, of course, rejected by the Church and replaced by the one where a mighty God judges and sentences the soul after death to an eternal life in Heaven or Hell, or awaiting Heaven in Purgatory.
This view has survived thousands of years and is still shared by many people today.

3 – From Renaissance to Recent Times

The end of the Middle Ages is characterized by the revival of interest in arts, intellectual pursuits and new scientific endeavors, during the Renaissance, which spanned from the 14th through the 17th century. Faith as the foundation to understand the observed world started to gradually shift to a framework where mathematical patterns were sought to explain the more accurate astronomical observations then available as well as the motion of objects on Earth. Eroding thousands of years of the geocentric world view, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) defended that Earth and the other planets actually orbited the stationary Sun. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) discovered that the orbits of the planets were actually elliptical and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), with the aid of his pioneering telescope, observed that the hills and craters on the surface of the moon resembled more what is found on the surface of the Earth, rather than what would characterize an immutable and incorruptible celestial object. Galileo also studied the mechanics of falling objects, which led to the introduction of the concept of acceleration and got very close to the idea of inertia. As important as Galileo’s scientific discoveries was the methodology he introduced to study the laws of nature (which are still being practiced today), in which experiments are designed and performed with the goal of testing a hypothesis, and data are collected and analyzed in order to further be modeled by a mathematical formulation. The Aristotelian view of the universe was finally collapsing.

The scientific environment and the knowledge gathered by the mid 1600’s were very conducive for Isaac Newton (1642-1727) to write one of the most influential scientific works in the history of humankind, in which he formulates the laws of motion and the law of gravitation. His work buried forever the distinction between celestial and earthly bodies: an apple falling from a tree and the motion of the Earth orbiting the sun obey the same set of natural laws. The success of Newton’s work drew a group of the brightest physicists and mathematicians of that time to, throughout the 18th century, expand his work and successfully apply it to a variety of different physical systems. In the 19th century the quest to make sense of our universe proceeded with scientists laying the foundation for the laws of electromagnetism and thermodynamics. Electromagnetism, among other things, explained the nature of light, made possible the creation of electrical motors and batteries and gave rise to the field of telecommunications. Thermodynamics allowed the improvement of the steam engine, a central piece of technology that fueled the Industrial Revolution.

With the birth of quantum mechanics, the 20th century saw an extraordinary advancement in understanding the building blocks that form matter. It also witnessed Albert Einstein’s (1879-1955) formulation of the special and general theories of relativity, which prescribed a new mechanics for objects traveling with speeds close to the speed of light and increased our understanding of the laws governing the formation and evolution of galaxies, black holes and stars that inhabit the observable universe. Relativity and quantum mechanics unveiled aspects of nature never imagined by Newton: time and space inextricably dependent on one another, the uncertainty principle dictating the impossibility of simultaneously measuring certain physical quantities with the same level of precision, and the warping of space and time due to the presence of gravitational fields.

At the beginning of the 21th century, it is undeniable that tremendous progress has been made in the understanding of the universe we live in, and the answers to the original question “How is the world made?” are dramatically different from the ones given thousand of years ago. Yet although so much has been learned about our universe, there are still plenty of unanswered questions whose answers will require the devotion and brilliance of scientists for may generations. Just to give one example, a central question in cosmology today is to understand the fact that everything that can be observed in the universe represents only 4% of what is predicted to exist. The remaining 96% is attributed to the “dark mass” (23%), a hidden mass without which galaxies could not even be formed, and the “dark energy” (73%), an unknown force that permeates the
empty space and accelerates the expansion of the universe [1].

4 – Researching our Spirituality

As for the question “Is there life after death?” how much scientific progress has been made in the past thousand years in the attempt to scientifically answer it? Some, but the answers to this question still remain largely confined to the realm of religious beliefs. Today, this subject is much more likely to be discussed in a Sunday Bible school classroom than in an auditorium of a School of Natural Sciences or the Psychiatry
Department of a university.

The first attempts to scientifically address the survival of the soul after death occurred in the second half of the19th century. The famous episode of the Fox sisters, which took place in 1848 in the small town of Hydesville, NY, triggered the first studies involving allegations of communications from a disembodied soul. The teenagers Kate and Margaret Fox, after hearing, for months, unexplained rapping noises in their house, claimed to have succeeded in establishing a communication with the source of those sounds. Using a code based on the number of knocks, the sisters and many other witnesses were told by the source of the rapping sounds that he was the spirit of a peddler who had been murdered in that house five years earlier. This case quickly gained notoriety because it was witnessed by many neighbors and documented by the press. On many other occasions, strange and unexplained phenomena, like flying objects and other rapping sounds followed the Fox sisters. In many cases the phenomena showed to have sprung from an intelligent source. For many years the Fox girls used their gift mainly to entertain crowds of curious people who paid to be amused and thrilled by what is presumed to be the actions of spirits. Various scholars submitted the two women to rigorous studies, but the genuineness of the occurrences has never been conclusively disproved.¹ A detailed account of the life of the Fox sisters can be found in [2].

The practice of communicating with spirits by decoding rapping sounds or the unattended movement of small objects or pieces of furniture rapidly became a source of entertainment in the US and Europe. A small group of people sitting around a table with the palm of their hands on top, but not necessarily touching it, enabled the table to move up in the air and down. The members of the group then asked questions that were answered by the table according to a pre-arranged code associating the letters of the alphabet to the taps of the leg’s table on the floor. The phenomenon became known as dancing or turning tables.

In the spring of 1855, in Paris, Hyppolyte L. D. Rivail (1804-1869), reluctantly accepted an invitation to participate in a dancing table experiment. Professor Rivail was an educator who taught math, sciences and French and a scholar who wrote mathematics and French Grammar textbooks as well a number of papers suggesting improvements to the French public educational system. His scientific mind scoffed the idea that tables had the capacity to think. But after attending one séance and conducting some experiments he was very impressed with the results. There was no doubt in his mind that the table did jump independently of the participants’ will and logically responded to their queries. Intrigued by the nature of the phenomenon, he participated in other meetings to continue his observations. When he asked the table how it could think without having a brain and a nervous system, the answer was that it was not the table that was thinking, but the souls of people who once lived on Earth. Surprised by this revelation, he started to ask questions in his own mind (without vocalizing them), to which the table gave proper answers. In order to avoid being deceived, he brought to the meetings questions written in a sealed envelope and unknown by any other participant. The questions were answered appropriately.

Convinced that the table was being handled by an intelligent being, Prof. Rivail wanted to expedite the communication with it since it tapping out the alphabetic code was tedious and slow. He placed a small basket on the table with a pencil attached to it. He realized that just one person in the group, with a hand on top of the basket, could make the basket move and write whole sentences. Later he found that the basket was unnecessary and the person could directly hold the pencil and serve as the medium (or intermediary) to intermediate the communications from the intelligent sources he called spirits. He continued conducting these meetings, asking thoughtful questions in order to exploit the scientific, philosophical and religious aspects of this new reality that it was being presented to him by the spirits. In order to rule out the influence of the medium in the communications, Prof. Rivail asked the same questions through several mediums in different meetings. After two years of intensive work, asking questions, compiling the answers and adding his commentaries, he published in 1857 The Spirit’s Book [3] under the pseudonym of Allan Kardec. This book is the foundation of the doctrine he called Spiritism [4], which is a science that studies the origin, nature and destiny of spirits as well the relationships that exist between the corporeal and spiritual worlds.

The growth of the modern spiritualism movement in England (which started in the US following the events that took place at the Fox family’s home in Hydesville, as described above) prompted the chemist and physicist Sir William Crookes (1832-1919), a Fellow of the Royal Society, to conduct, in 1870, a series of experiments to investigate the validity of the claims that certain people had the capacity to interact with spirits. He did not believe in these claims and thought that there was a lack of scientific evidence to support them. His initiative was very well received by the British scientific community, who trusted his academic credentials and authority to expose once and for all the pretenses of Spiritualism. His research program consisted of submitting different mediums to a number of rigorous tests at his home, where he had total control of the environment, in order to avoid any possible behind the scene preparation by the subjects under study. During four years of experimental work with a number of mediums, including Kate Fox, he observed a variety of extraordinary events that could not be attributed to trickery or forgery. He divided those events into classes of phenomena, some of which are:
• the movement of heavy bodies with contact, but without mechanical exertion (the turning tables described above fall into this class);
• the phenomena of percussive and other allied sounds (the rapping sounds heard at the Fox family’s home is an example);
• the levitation of human beings;
• movement of various small articles without contact with any person, materialization of objects; and
• special instances which seem to point to the agency of an exterior intelligence.
The reports of his experiments were published in The Quarterly Journal of Science and they are compiled in the book Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritualism [5]. In the issue of January 1874, Crookes wrote:

The phenomena I am prepared to attest are so extraordinary and so directly oppose the most firmly rooted articles of scientific belief that there is an antagonism in my mind between reason, which pronounces it to be scientifically impossible, and the consciousness that my senses are not lying witnesses when they testify against my preconceptions.

In the 20th century the research work initiated by Dr. Ian Stevenson (1918-2007) in the U.S. represented an important contribution to the understanding of our spiritual nature. Dr. Stevenson was the Director of the Division of Personality Studies of the Department of Psychiatric Medicine of the University of Virginia, where he was also a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry. He and his team collected, for the period of 40 years, detailed documentation about children from all over the world who could remember facts that occurred in their previous lives. The analysis of over 3000 cases revealed a match between the children’s descriptions of details of their previous lives (such as their own names, the names of relatives or friends, names of places, occurrences, or the cause of their death) and official documentation and/or spoken reports from those who knew the deceased person alluded by the children. In some cases, children’s birth marks coincided exactly with the location of the wound (confirmed by autopsy reports) that caused the death of the person, as reported by those children. The Division of Personality Studies also investigates cases of near-death experiences, out-of-body experiences, apparitions and after-death communications, and deathbed visions. Its website [6] contains more detailed information about the research programs as well as a list of publications.

The faculty of mediumship has been used in one of the research programs (called VERITAS) conducted by the Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health of the Department of Psychology at the University of Arizona. The group is led by Dr Gary E. Schwartz and Dr. Julie Beischel and its goal is “to test the hypothesis that the consciousness (or personality or identity) of a person survives physical death.” [7]. Double and even triple-blind experiments have been performed to analyze communications of mediums who report information from deceased individuals who were emotionally close to persons they call sitters. The level of correctness of the information provided by the medium is assured by the multi-blind method where the mediums, sitters and experimenters have no previous knowledge about the content of the information or the relationship between the deceased person and the sitters. The result of their experiments as well as a list of publications by the VERITAS research program can
be found in their website [7].

5 - Conclusions

The studies described above – which are not an exhaustive account of the work done in this area to date [8] – illustrate that although some progress has been made in the past 160 years in the understanding of the spiritual nature of human beings, it has not occurred at the same pace in which the understanding of our material world evolved.

It is not difficult to understand why so little effort is being made today by the scientific community as a whole to broaden our knowledge in this area. Topics like reincarnation, clairvoyance, telekinesis, spirit communications and mediumship, for instance, are not generally perceived as subjects that can be included in the domain of standard science. This phenomenology is commonly labeled as “paranormal” and studies in these areas are very often referred to as pseudo-science or would-be science and, therefore, not worth to be properly credited. As a result, research in these fields does not attract the interest of many scientists, or funding for those who desire to scientifically explore these areas of knowledge. Not to mention the risks that those scientists would run of tainting their reputation and jeopardizing the advancement of their academic careers. Besides, there are still many interesting and important scientific problems to be resolved in the so-called standard science, enough to keep generations of scientists at work. On the other hand, the still limited knowledge we have of our universe gives scientists plenty of room for scientific explorations in the spiritual sphere.

However, the scientific studies reveal strong and compelling evidence that a human being is not only a collection of organs commanded by the brain, but it also contains an essence (called differently by different researchers: consciousness, spirit, personality, etc) that survives the death of the body. Once disincarnated, it preserves its individuality, its knowledge, its ability to have emotions and think, and is able to interact with matter and other human beings. It also shows that this essence might even reincarnate again in another physical body as a next step in its journey. Of course, there is still much more to be learned about the spiritual world and its interface with the better understood material world. But this knowledge can only be obtained by means of laborious scientific research based on facts and observations, free of prejudices and pre-conceived ideas about how nature should or should not be. As the history of science has showed us in many instances – some of them briefly discussed in this article – the great scientific discoveries that reshaped the human perception of the world were achieved by those brilliant and open minded individuals who dared to raise their capacity of abstraction, ingenuity and creativity to a level that went way beyond the current knowledge and beliefs of their times.

Fraud in this area is, and has always been, a reality and greatly contributes for the general perception that spiritual phenomena are nothing but a pre-staged set of well performed tricks with the sole purpose of extracting money from credulous and uncritical people. Although true in many instances, the generalization that any spiritual phenomenon is a hoax and that any medium is an impostor is an error that blinds those who refuse to accept the possibility of genuine spiritual manifestations. These manifestations do occur and have been occurring since the beginning of times simply because they are an intrinsic part of the universe we live in, and, as such, governed by well defined natural laws, which we do not yet completely understand. Rejecting or simply ignoring the reality of these phenomena, or attributing them to trickery or the fertile imagination and wishful thinking of those who aspire immortality, just delay our journey on the inevitable path to the understanding of the natural laws that govern them.

The perception that spirituality is a religious affair that should be dealt exclusively by the followers of different religions according to the incontestable dogmas dictated by their faith certainly plays an important role in keeping it out of the reach of the rational scrutiny of scientific investigation. But religion (from the Latin re-ligare, meaning a reattachment to the divinity) should not, in principle, represent an impediment to the progress of science. The personal decision to embrace a religion and live a life based on its moral teachings should not be a reason to shutdown one’s mind to the pursuit or acceptance of new scientific discoveries. Throughout history and even today, the fierce opposition that certain religious leaders have made to well-established scientific findings is not due to their religiosity, but rather to their intolerance and close mindedness to accept a world view that conflicts with their personal ones. Unfortunately, in the quest to understand the spiritual nature of human beings, close mindedness is also present in many non-religious, atheist or agnostic men and women of sciences.

In the continual pursuit of knowledge, humankind has diligently and successfully (many times against the religious and political establishment of their times) unveiled the workings and mysteries of nature. It is just a matter of time until the scientific community becomes more receptive to the reality of the spiritual realm as an inherent component of our universe and embarks in the endeavor of deciphering its laws and the mechanisms
through which they manifest themselves.

The author would like to thank Dianne King and Alexander Moreira-Almeida for the valuable comments and suggestions.

1 56 years after the Hydesville episode, the skeleton of a man along with a peddler’s tin box was found in the cellar of the house where the Fox sisters lived in 1848. This news was reported by the Boston Journal of November 23, 1904 [2].


6 – References

[1] JOEL R. PRIMACK and NANCY ELLEN ABRAMS, The View from the Center of the Universe, Penguin Group, 2006. See also http://universeadventure.org/final_frontier/dkmttr-whatis.htm.
[2] DOYLE, Arthur Conan, The History of Spiritualism, The Echo Library, 2006.
[3] KARDEC, Allan, The Spirit’s Book, Allan Kardec Educational Society, 1996.
[4] More information about Allan Kardec and Spiritism, including related literature, can be found at the United States Spiritist Council website at
http://www.usspiritistcouncil.com/.
[5] CROOKES, William, Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritualism, Reprinted from The Quarterly Journal of Science. Kessinger Publishing, 2007.
[6] http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/personalitystudies/.
[7] http://veritas.arizona.edu/.
[8] To add a few more to the list of studies described in Section 4, see for instance,
• ZÖLLNER, Johann Karl Friedrich, Transcendental Physics. Written in 1878 with the original title Die Transcendental und die Sogennante Philosophie, the German physicist J. Zöllner reports the results of the experimental research conducted with the medium Henry Slade at the University of Leipzig.
• LODGE, Oliver Joseph, Raymond, or Life and Death, London, 1916. (http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/books/lodge/raymond/contents.htm). Sir Oliver Lodge was a Professor of Physics and Mathematics at the University College, Liverpool. He became a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1887 and was knighted in 1902. This book is one of many of his publications in the area of spiritual phenomenology.
• GREYSON, Bruce, Near-death experience: clinical implications, Revista de Psiquiatria Clinica, Vol 34, Suplemento 1, 2007, (in English)
http://www.hcnet.usp.br/ipq/revista/vol34/s1/en/49.html, and references therein.
• CHIBENI, Silvio Seno and MOREIRA-ALMEIDA, Alexander, Remarks on the scientific exploration of “anomalous” psychiatric phenomena,
http://www.hcnet.usp.br/ipq/revista/vol34/s1/en/8.html, Revista de Psiquiatria Clinica, Vol 34, Suplemento 1, 2007. This article (in English) analyzes the epistemological implications to any science investigating the relationships between health and spirituality.
• Society for Psychical Research, http://www.spr.ac.uk/expcms/index.php?section=1
• A valuable source of research papers can be found at http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/articles.htm.

Note from the Editor: The author Ricardo C. Mastroleo is a member of the Allan Karadec Spiritist Educational Center [info@aksec.org] of Austin, Texas

Back to Content

 ° NEWS, EVENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS
 
LEARNING ABOUT LIFE WITH CHILDREN

Cases  on Near Death Experiences  with Children
by Melvin Morse, MD


                                                  Sunday, June 8, 2008
                                                   10:30 am – 12:00 pm

Medical degree from George Washington University, Washington, D.C., with a specialization in Pediatrics. Besides private practice, is a professor in Seattle at the University of Washington. Twenty years ago, was the first to research Near Death Experiences (NDE) in children. Has produced scientific articles and books that have generated numerous documentaries and interviews. Wrote the best-sellers Closer to the Light (translated into 19 languages in 38
countries),Transformed by the Light, Parting Visions and Where God Lives.


Dr. Morse's website: www.melvinmorse.com


Back to Content


20th PAN AMERICAN SPIRITIST CONGRESS

Spiritism’s Contribution towards the Integral Development of Humanity

 


"Spiritism is both an observational science and a philosophical doctrine. As a practical science,
it consists of the interactions that can be established with spirits; as a philosophical
doctrine, it comprehends all the moral consequences
derived from such a relationship."
 
Allan Kardec 

                                   

During June 4th through the 8th  of 2008, Spiritists and those interested will meet at in San Juan, Puerto Rico at a Spiritist Congress sponsored jointly by the international  Pan American Spiritist Confederation and the Puerto Rican Spiritist Relations Council.

 

Information and education will revolve around three main themes: Spiritism as a Tool towards Spirituality, as well as Moral Ethics, and Social Ethics- in these Modern Times.

 

There will be panel discussions, specific lectures, and speakers on open topics relating to the Spiritist Doctrine. The Congress will end with a closing ceremony, as well as a dinner and dance.

 

Anyone interested in obtaining more information may visit the following website: www.conocenos.org/CEPA2008


Back to Content

JOINT CONFERENCES IN THE UK

Divaldo Franco - Guy Playfair - Dr. Andrew Powell



Back to Content

THE SPIRITIST MAGAZINE


An Official Publication of The International Spiritist Council


Inspired by Allan Kardec’s works in the Revue Spirite (founded on January 1st, Magazine aims to bring to Spiritists and the lay public updated news about the Spiritist science, including its advancements on the understanding of our origin, nature, and destiny as immortal spirits. The magazine also focuses on revisiting Allan Kardec’s foundational works. This first edition was made available at the 2nd Spirititst Symposium at New York Historical Society on April 19, 2008. Initially, The Spiritist Magazine will be published quarterly in print and online starting in April 2008. Subscriptions is now available online. For more information please go to:







Back to Content


GRUPO DE ESTUDOS AVANÇADOS ESPÍRITAS

ADVANCED STUDY GROUP OF SPIRITISM

Electronic weekly report in Portuguese - Boletim do GEAE

Monthly English report: "The Spiritist Messenger"


The Spiritist Messenger is sent by email to GEAE subscribers

(Free) subscriptions http://www.geae.inf.br/
Send your comments to editor-en@geae.inf.br

To cancel the subscription send an e-mail to editor-en@geae.inf.br
or to inscricao-en@geae.inf.br with the subject "unsubscribe"

Editorial Council - mailto:editor@geae.inf.br

Collection in Portuguese (Boletim do GEAE)

Collection in English (The Spiritist Messenger

Collection in Spanish (El Mensajero Espírita)